We Should Revisit Literate Programming in the Agent Era

· · 来源:tutorial资讯

同样是IDC报告显示,2025年上半年中国AI云服务收入约3.9亿美元,阿里云份额约23%居首,火山引擎约13%排第二;而放到更外层的整体云市场,字节份额仍只有约3%。

画出一条最佳拟合曲线,你就能预见六个月后AI编程智能体将达到怎样的高度。。新收录的资料是该领域的重要参考

界面早报

One thing that allowed software to evolve much faster than most other human fields is the fact the discipline is less anchored to patents and protections (and this, in turn, is likely as it is because of a sharing culture around the software). If the copyright law were more stringent, we could likely not have what we have today. Is the protection of single individuals' interests and companies more important than the general evolution of human culture? I don’t think so, and, besides, the copyright law is a common playfield: the rules are the same for all. Moreover, it is not a stretch to say that despite a more relaxed approach, software remains one of the fields where it is simpler to make money; it does not look like the business side was impacted by the ability to reimplement things. Probably, the contrary is true: think of how many businesses were made possible by an open source software stack (not that OSS is mostly made of copies, but it definitely inherited many ideas about past systems). I believe, even with AI, those fundamental tensions remain all valid. Reimplementations are cheap to make, but this is the new playfield for all of us, and just reimplementing things in an automated fashion, without putting something novel inside, in terms of ideas, engineering, functionalities, will have modest value in the long run. What will matter is the exact way you create something: Is it well designed, interesting to use, supported, somewhat novel, fast, documented and useful? Moreover, this time the inbalance of force is in the right direction: big corporations always had the ability to spend obscene amounts of money in order to copy systems, provide them in a way that is irresistible for users (free, for many years, for instance, to later switch model) and position themselves as leaders of ideas they didn’t really invent. Now, small groups of individuals can do the same to big companies' software systems: they can compete on ideas now that a synthetic workforce is cheaper for many.。新收录的资料对此有专业解读

Follow topics & set alerts with myFT,推荐阅读新收录的资料获取更多信息

Leeser urg

「在12個月內,我從全球各地爭取到了超過18兆美元的投資承諾」

关键词:界面早报Leeser urg

免责声明:本文内容仅供参考,不构成任何投资、医疗或法律建议。如需专业意见请咨询相关领域专家。

分享本文:微信 · 微博 · QQ · 豆瓣 · 知乎

网友评论